|
Post by FlyingDutchman on Sept 26, 2016 19:45:01 GMT
This is a poll to vote on roster sizes for this season. We have been rolling with 27 man rosters (plus prospects), but some have suggested upping it with so many available players now.
|
|
|
Post by melbournecity on Sept 29, 2016 11:50:02 GMT
That make a majority vote then?
|
|
|
Post by tamby on Sept 30, 2016 1:50:51 GMT
My vote counts 10 so keeping the rosters as-is is winning.
|
|
kbooks
New Member
Active member
Posts: 31
|
Post by kbooks on Oct 3, 2016 1:53:08 GMT
So is this vote for a larger roster simply academic and the majority is being overruled?
|
|
|
Post by FlyingDutchman on Oct 3, 2016 3:02:42 GMT
This is why you have to use emoticons Tamby.
|
|
|
Post by melbournecity on Oct 3, 2016 5:15:28 GMT
Hahaha
|
|
kbooks
New Member
Active member
Posts: 31
|
Post by kbooks on Oct 3, 2016 9:48:08 GMT
I don't understand why a 75% membership vote for larger rosters is not enough. Why did we have the vote?
|
|
|
Post by tamby on Oct 3, 2016 16:30:50 GMT
I don't understand why a 75% membership vote for larger rosters is not enough. Why did we have the vote? To get your hopes up.
|
|
|
Post by groundlethal on Oct 4, 2016 0:07:34 GMT
LOL
|
|
|
Post by radioblaster on Oct 4, 2016 1:44:19 GMT
given it was 9 v 3, doesn't this mean that larger rosters has won? a quorum of a supermajority or some shit?
|
|
ira
Junior Member
Posts: 51
|
Post by ira on Oct 4, 2016 2:26:55 GMT
Tamby is Boaty Mcboatfacing us
|
|
kbooks
New Member
Active member
Posts: 31
|
Post by kbooks on Oct 4, 2016 2:39:24 GMT
This significantly reduced league is off to a shaky start I am afraid to say. Transactions are not being processed. Polls are being ignored or at least not acted on and member activity is very limited. I want this league to survive and prosper but must confess I am having doubts about the long term viability of the LSHL. I hope this is just a side effect of my impetuousness
|
|
|
Post by radioblaster on Oct 4, 2016 6:29:06 GMT
c. For a rule change to pass a supermajority vote of a quorum is necessary. i. A quorum shall consist of two-thirds of the leagues owners. ii. A supermajority shall consist of three-fifths of the members who have voted.
i. done! ii. done!
30 players plus prospects it is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
if you have already listed some cuts, please feel free to put them back on your roster.
|
|
|
Post by melbournecity on Oct 4, 2016 7:25:53 GMT
c. For a rule change to pass a supermajority vote of a quorum is necessary. i. A quorum shall consist of two-thirds of the leagues owners. ii. A supermajority shall consist of three-fifths of the members who have voted. i. done! ii. done! 30 players plus prospects it is!!!!!!!!!!!!!! if you have already listed some cuts, please feel free to put them back on your roster. Will do mate, I'll pm them through later
|
|
|
Post by tamby on Oct 4, 2016 17:53:21 GMT
This significantly reduced league is off to a shaky start I am afraid to say. Transactions are not being processed. Polls are being ignored or at least not acted on and member activity is very limited. I want this league to survive and prosper but must confess I am having doubts about the long term viability of the LSHL. I hope this is just a side effect of my impetuousness Dude, I thought it was fairly obvious that I was kidding around. Of course we're going to go with a rule change that wins via poll per the Rules & Regs. As for transactions not being processed, the season hasn't even started yet, and we've always backdated transactions to the confirmation date if they aren't processed same-day. The same goes for activity...the season hasn't even started yet. Relaaaaax.
|
|